There exist many words whose meanings are opposites of themselves.
You may ask, How can a word be an antonym of itself? Through polysemy and homonymy, a word that is pronounced or spelled the same way can have opposite meanings. A word that is an antonym of itself is called a contronym.
A commonly known contronym one is dust (verb). The two opposite meanings of dust are:
1. remove fine particles: Please dust the drawers to keep them clean.
2. cover with fine particles: He dusted the cookies with sugar.
Seed (verb) is another one:
1. remove seeds from: Seed the watermelon before eating.
2. distribute seeds; to sow seeds
To "X" something is a phrase often used colloquially. Here are its opposite meanings:
1. select: X your desired items on the list.
2. cancel/eliminate: Please X out the items you don't want.
Monday, October 08, 2007
Same word, opposite meaning
Wednesday, September 26, 2007
Breaking words down in more than one way
There are some cases in which morphemes can be ambiguous.
Take the following word:
unionized
The more familiar meaning is "formed into a union". The other, less commonly known meaning comes from chemistry: "not converted into ions"; it's actually the word ionized with the un- prefix. This is an example of a homograph, as the words can have two pronunciations and different meanings altogether but are spelled the same.
The root words are different: in the first case, it's union, and in the second case it's ion. Here's the morpheme breakdown of both meanings of unionized:
unionized:
union : root word
-ize : changes a noun into a verb (union -> unionize)
-ed : past tense (unionize -> unionized)
unionized:
ion : root word
-ize : changes a noun into a verb (ion -> ionize)
un- : "not" (ionize -> unionize)
-ed : past tense (unionize -> unionized)
In the second case, notice that the order matters: the un- prefix is applied after -ize, as there isn't a word such as "un-ion".
Posted by john at Wednesday, September 26, 2007 305 comments
Categories: meaning, morphology, polysemy, pronunciation
Friday, May 18, 2007
Multiple Meanings: Homonymy vs Polysemy
In a previous post, polysemy (the multiple meanings of words) was discussed. How does this differ from homonyms, which are words that are spelled the same and have different meanings?
There are also words which have the same spelling but are pronounced differently. These are called homographs. The reverse case can be true, with words having different written forms and same pronunciation. These are known as homophones.
Summary:
homograph: same spelling, different pronunciation
Example
dove: a kind of bird
dove: past tense of dive
homophone: different spelling, same pronunciation
Example
two, too, to
homonym: same spelling, same pronunciation, and the words have different meanings
Example
bank: a financial institution
bank: a slope bordering a river
You may have noticed that homonymy and polysemy are very similar. How does one distinguish these two concepts? It is often useful to look into the etymology of the word, i.e., its historical origin. Another way to examine this concept would be to analyze the commonality of the different possible meanings of the word.
Here is an example that can show you how to differentiate homonyms and polysemic words:
plain = polysemic (can be thought of "simple" as in plain English or "devoid of complexity" plain shirt)
bank = homonym (no relation to each other; a river bank has nothing to do with a financial institution)
Posted by john at Friday, May 18, 2007 163 comments
Categories: homonymy, polysemy, pronunciation, sounds, spelling
Tuesday, May 15, 2007
Translation Trouble: Polysemy
Do you sometimes wonder why certain materials are badly translated? This is due to polysemy: the many meanings that a single word can take.
For example, In English, the word plain can take on the following meanings:
- ordinary / undecorated: a plain white shirt
- easy / simple to understand: plain English
- a level area of land: great plains

It gets more complicated when translating English into other languages.
For example, there are over 20 ways of saying "to get" in French. This is because there are multiple meanings of "get" that are used in English, but the French must use a different word for each of those meanings. It isn't that obvious, but this can give translators some trouble.

At elementary levels of French, most are taught the verb obtenir ("to get"). But which sense of the word "get" is really used here? Obtenir is used when something is acquired (it looks like the English word obtain). A different word must be used if you want "get" to take on a different meaning.
In each of the following sentences "get" takes a different meaning:
- I need to get some bread. (buy)
- I get the idea. (understand)
- We need to get home. (arrive)
This is just one word out of many which can cause translation difficulty. One must study the context carefully and do not try to translate word for word, or even worse, rely on an automated translator.
Posted by john at Tuesday, May 15, 2007 115 comments
Categories: french, homonymy, meaning, polysemy, translation
